The meaning of words- feminism

KQ: What is the role of language in creating and reinforcing social distinctions, such as class and gender?


Language is one of the fundamental driving forces of growth and innovation through the communication with others. Its use can inspire change and improvement and can give rise to many new things and concepts. Ideas, definitions and many other things can be adapted into language to aid our knowledge and understanding of these topics. However, because of the diversity of human understanding and interpretation, language can be used to represent points of different angles which can contradict or misrepresent. Many of these issues can be found with the modern controversy of feminism.

In general, feminism is the advocacy and agenda of pushing female rights. Throughout history, this has been attempted in a multitude of ways. These range from the original radical and militaristic approach to the modern vocal fight through social media. There have been adversities faced through both approaches, however, the direct and physical approach could be less misinterpreted and achieved direct results. Now a days, all social movements are conducted purely with language and the anonymity that the internet provides combined with already established freedom of speech brings a crowd of people who do not have the same conviction or ideals. 

Feminism is seen by many as an excuse to justify a lifestyle now a days, and in many instances this remains true. Modern feminism in first world countries has no more adversities and is descending into trivial things such as sexist air conditioning and criticizing men's suicide support groups. The way they represent their cause can shine a negative light on all of it, especially when the tone is condescending and filled with cursing. This is an example of internal stigmatization but it can also be found externally. Many misogynistic people and more conservative parties act external pressure onto the feminist movement by calling out hypocrisy or generally voicing their discontent. Both of these negatives and their constant vocal involvement continuously prevent the focus on serious topics by overshadowing the silent majority. Unfortunately, this inflation of voices is what gives modern feminism a bad reputation.

                                 Human Sciences

Perception:

Perceptions are a very powerful influence on observation and gathering data. If researchers don't stay objective, they can fall for a psychological social construct called 'conformation bias'. This occurs when a researcher only acknowledges facts and information that conform with their prediction. This skews observation from reality and results in inaccurate data

Emotion:

Human sciences show us that emotion is a result of a large variety of factors. When linking this to the levels of understanding in psychology, we know that human behavior is a result of biology, society and cognition. Occasionally there are abnormal factors which are unexplored but the majority falls into these 3 categories. Each one provides a different perspective and allows for the creation of a larger picture.

Language:

Language is a very important factor of communication. Even in the animal kingdom we can observe how certain creatures communicate with each other in order to get what they want. We can also observe that some are better at this than others. This is often due to an evolutionary straight which we can perceive as charisma. Charisma is many things but it is often the use of language which is appealing to others. Obviously, if a person with this lingual mastery enters a poll (where people will vote based on who they prefer) being a great orator will give them a significant advantage.

Reason:

The logic of scientific discovery is that we research and obtain information in the hopes of incorporating it into technology. This technology is used to increase the standard of living for humans and make life more comfortable and interesting. Of course it is also done to satisfy a natural curiosity or levels of military power. In short, logic and research are tools in which we can systematically satisfy our irrational urges and desires.

Mathematics:

human behavior is the result of trillions of unaccounted biological and environmental factors to such a complexity that we need grouping methods to limit the factors of calculation. As a species, we have not been able to identify ever one of these factors which leaves us with to many placeholders in a massive equation. Until these placeholders have been replaced with values, we are unable to calculate human behavior purely mathematically.

Religion:

I have already established that reason is the tool of often irrational behavior. Religion is the product of superstition and fear but also of human hopes and aspirations. These have served as motivators since the beginning of human though and conception. Many famous scientists have religious backgrounds but this may simply be due to association. However, we must also consider all the limitations that religion has imposed on scientific discovery, which makes it difficult to praise it.

Natural Sciences:

Human sciences are much more complex than natural sciences because of their higher level orders of operation. Gravity is a law of physics and is easy to explain and calculate. The relation between atoms is chemistry which has its own rules and calculations that are based on pre-conceptualized physical knowledge. The growth of cells is part of biology which is based upon both chemistry and physics while the study of the brain is based upon neurology, biology, chemistry and physics. This level of intricacy is what differentiates it but it is still based on the same principles.

Ethics: 

Morality and their responsibilities are a product of empathetic human thought (one of the most complex neurological processes). Since humans have both designed these concepts and accepted them socially, the only ones who can place value on it are humans themselves. Therefore, if humans chose to abide to these rules it is not only their responsibility, but literally they are the only ones who can uphold moral responsibility.

The Arts:

Knowledge gained from human sciences is concrete and absolute (implying that it is done correctly). It usually breaks behavior into all of its basic components which allow us to see exactly what, how and why something is happening. However, due to technological and conceptual limitations, we can not currently achieve the knowledge of complex thought and emotion. Currently, only the human arts and literature (areas where the mind has full creative freedom without scientific restrictions) can provide us with the level of insight into our psyche which allow us to witness and understand the complexity of what it is to be human. 

History: 

It is fundamental that scientists know the history of their subject because of the building block effect. In order to increase our levels and complexity of research and understanding, we must be able to rely and trust on pre-conceptualized knowledge. Only by using previous research as building blocks, are we able to exponentially increase our levels of technology and scientific understanding which can propel us into a highly sophisticated future as quickly as possible. Therefore, history and other past learning experiences are vital for us to enhance our knowledge

                                                           Lesson      2/14/2017

Politics do not necessarily need to priorities truth in their venture. Politics are all about the balance of power in the pursuit of national interests. While the truth should be a goal for every human being and organization, the modern world is built on deceit and the struggle for data. After all, knowledge is power. Attaining harmful evidence on another party and hiding one's own evidence puts someone in the place of a significant advantage. Therefore, it is in no politicians or governments interest to primarily peruse the truth over their power agendas.

Political rhetoric is much like advertisement, they are designed to be convincing but must abide by state and country laws. Political rhetoric can go as far as possible until it reaches a certain threshold. This includes, withholding information and using false information as evidence. These are against the law and go against any sincere purpose of a government body. Once this starts to occur, the government must be weeded out for corruption and uprooted to bring in people that are more trust worthy. If this does not happen, the country could very well go down the path of corruption and into dictatorship.

                                 Lesson           3/2/2017

“Facts are needed to establish theories but theories are needed to make sense of facts.” Discuss this statement with reference to two areas of knowledge

It is well established that theories are a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena. Most theories that are accepted by scientists have been repeatedly tested by experiments and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena. A fact is a thing that is known or proved to be true. Theories explain certain occurrences and facts support the validity of these theories. This statement is a circular example of the two requirements that make up the scientific method.

When looking at this statement, one can see that it is the ideal connection between history and the sciences (Areas f Knowledge). History includes all past events of existence and is the entire collective of the development of the human race that led us to this moment in time. It can also be seen as a timeline for trials and errors and we can see how human conceptual understanding has evolved. Every time, we learn or understand something we write it down. As time and effort progresses, we can dismiss false information or build on base knowledge to give rise to complicated and sophisticated understandings such as the quantum theory or atomic fission. The progression of knowledge that is built on history is achieved through science, as the rigorous testing and theories can amount to great technologies and improvements over time.

The assumptions made by this claim is that facts and theories need to work hand in hand in order to have any significance in our understanding. While this is true, facts do single handedly remain the underlying principle of all knowledge. Only because there is no theory to make sense of a fact, this does not abolish the fact. However, if there are no facts to establish the theory, the theory becomes obsolete. Sometimes we must realize, that in order to further our understanding, we need to take educated and evolutionary guesses and form them into theories. Than do we have the focus to direct our research towards something in order to prove/disprove something (quantum theory). So, really, we can pursue both things separately as long as we make sure that they add up to each other in the end, to create factual knowledge.

Regarding this statement, there is absolutely no bias to be found. It is stating that understanding cannot be achieved without the other which is counterproductive to successful persuasion which relies on deceiving and not teaching critical thinking to its audience. Belief is also absent as it argues the importance of evidence in order for things to be valid. This is the opposite of belief. There are also few flaws to be found, sure, anything can receive criticism but this statement is the foundation of all modern science and information. Having been accepted by such a variety of academics and the mass population, this statement holds massive validity which makes it valid, certain, truthful and reliable and is the keystone for justification in the first place. Additionally, it is the definition of objectivity which makes it impossible to be categorized as subjective. The only thing it can be properly criticized for is being limited. It is a very rigid statement and does not allow for much artful thinking, however, considering that its purpose is to ensure accurate understanding, this seems like a small price to pay.